{"status":"OK","data":{"id":562503,"identifier":"P0ZHR3","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34894/P0ZHR3","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.34894","separator":"/","publisher":"DataverseNL","publicationDate":"2025-11-19","storageIdentifier":"surf://10.34894/P0ZHR3","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":10000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":9996,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":31986,"datasetId":562503,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.34894/P0ZHR3","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"surf://10.34894/P0ZHR3","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":6,"versionMinorNumber":1,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionLink":"","lastUpdateTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:58Z","releaseTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:58Z","createTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:51Z","publicationDate":"2025-11-19","citationDate":"2025-11-19","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":10000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":9996,"license":{"name":"CC0-1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":true,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Study 4: Co-creation of a fit-for-purpose Feedback Toolkit for clinical clerkships."},{"typeName":"subtitle","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Javiera Fuentes Cimma - PhD Project data for study 4"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Javiera Fuentes Cimma"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"maastrichtuniversity.nl"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactName":{"typeName":"datasetContactName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Shedata"},"datasetContactAffiliation":{"typeName":"datasetContactAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"maastrichtuniversity.nl"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Feedback is a powerful educational intervention in clinical education, yet its effectiveness depends on how it is integrated into teaching and learning activities. Previous studies have shown that productive feedback in clinical education relies on sociocultural factors such as a supportive feedback culture, trustworthy relationships, and student agency. Co-creation is a promising approach for designing educational interventions that are contextually relevant and aligned with the needs of teachers and students. This study aimed to co-create a prototype of feedback processes specifically tailored for clinical undergraduate education through an iterative, collaborative approach.\nEight co-creation sessions were conducted with faculty, clinical teachers, students, and researchers. The process was iterative and grounded in feedback design principles informed by the literature. Co-creation led to the development of a prototype of a feedback toolkit, which was piloted in two dyads of clinical-teacher students in a seven-week physiotherapy clerkship. Weekly audio diaries were collected from participants and analyzed using content analysis.\nData from the co-creation sessions informed the development of a feedback toolkit specifically designed for the clinical teacher–student dyad. The toolkit was built upon three design principles: (1) Contributes to a trustful relationship based on continuous mutual support, (2) Envisioned learning opportunities and feedback scaffolding, and (3) Plan the use of feedback. To operationalize these principles, the toolkit included a set of practical materials: podcasts, infographics, feedback prompts, and a Mini-CEX. The pilot study demonstrated the toolkit's usability and acceptability and highlighted its value in structuring feedback interactions. Challenges included limited time for full implementation and difficulties in providing constructive feedback.\nThe co-creation approach enabled the development of a fit-for-purpose feedback toolkit that aligns with the dynamic needs of clinical education. This study highlights co-creation as a feasible strategy for designing feedback processes in workplace-based learning.\nThe attached files include the logbook in detail, which contains the information collected in the co-creation sessions. Additionally, I share information regarding the first input for the co-creation team and the audio diaries' weekly questions, which were used to collect data in the pilot study.<BR><BR>"},"dsDescriptionDate":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2025-11-19"}}]},{"typeName":"subject","multiple":true,"typeClass":"controlledVocabulary","value":["Social Sciences"]},{"typeName":"keyword","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Feedback, co-creation, health professions education, clinical clerkships."}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1.<BR>\nFuentes-Cimma J, Sluijsmans D, Ortega-Bastidas J, Villagran I, Riquelme-Perez A, Heeneman S. Students and Clinical Teachers’ Experiences About Productive Feedback Practices in the Clinical Workplace from a Sociocultural Perspective. International Medical Education. 2024 Nov 16;3(4):461-72.<BR>\n2.<BR>\nFuentes-Cimma J, Sluijsmans D, Riquelme A, Villagran I, Isbej L, Olivares-Labbe MT, Heeneman S. Designing feedback processes in the workplace-based learning of undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. 2024 Apr 23;24(1):440.<BR>"}}]},{"typeName":"depositor","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Shedata"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2025-11-19"}]},"dansDataVaultMetadata":{"displayName":"Data Vault Metadata","name":"dansDataVaultMetadata","fields":[{"typeName":"dansDataversePid","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"doi:10.34894/P0ZHR3"},{"typeName":"dansDataversePidVersion","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1.1"},{"typeName":"dansBagId","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"urn:uuid:bba0b209-1cf0-414d-9d86-7aaa8cc021eb"},{"typeName":"dansNbn","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-6b0853d2-4c33-43a0-a01a-4b7d54313a44"}]}},"files":[{"label":"20250123_Logbook_english.pdf","restricted":true,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":31986,"dataFile":{"id":562504,"persistentId":"","filename":"20250123_Logbook_english.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":287060,"storageIdentifier":"surf://store:19a9be8485d-c14b22029f63","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"57cb28a6ee98695aa14dc64474215da02e9f79e9"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationDate":"2025-11-19","lastUpdateTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:58Z","fileAccessRequest":true}},{"label":"Audio diaries weekly questions.pdf","restricted":true,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":31986,"dataFile":{"id":562507,"persistentId":"","filename":"Audio diaries weekly questions.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":65792,"storageIdentifier":"surf://store:19a9be85081-e0121ad266c7","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"03ffe3961fcf5a6fb3992158fb0ba212d31ee04e"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationDate":"2025-11-19","lastUpdateTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:58Z","fileAccessRequest":true}},{"label":"Co-creation sessions in detail.pdf","restricted":true,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":31986,"dataFile":{"id":562505,"persistentId":"","filename":"Co-creation sessions in detail.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":152486,"storageIdentifier":"surf://store:19a9be85861-4fc6a81a88d8","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"65a84f0988e9adb42cb6d206f1fbf55450b3b452"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationDate":"2025-11-19","lastUpdateTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:58Z","fileAccessRequest":true}},{"label":"First input to co-creation sessions.pdf","restricted":true,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":31986,"dataFile":{"id":562506,"persistentId":"","filename":"First input to co-creation sessions.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":71057,"storageIdentifier":"surf://store:19a9be85fe9-c250cffaff39","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"8dba94b0e8662d1e6140460450fa1b6608d36807"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationDate":"2025-11-19","lastUpdateTime":"2025-11-20T12:50:58Z","fileAccessRequest":true}}]}}}