{"status":"OK","data":{"id":400543,"identifier":"K8TQ2Q","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34894/K8TQ2Q","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.34894","separator":"/","publisher":"DataverseNL","publicationDate":"2024-02-13","storageIdentifier":"surf://10.34894/K8TQ2Q","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":10000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":9997,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":25874,"datasetId":400543,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.34894/K8TQ2Q","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"surf://10.34894/K8TQ2Q","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":25,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionLink":"","lastUpdateTime":"2024-02-13T14:10:55Z","releaseTime":"2024-02-13T14:10:55Z","createTime":"2024-01-25T08:46:25Z","publicationDate":"2024-02-13","citationDate":"2024-02-13","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":10000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":9997,"license":{"name":"CC-BY-NC-4.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0","iconUri":"https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png"},"fileAccessRequest":false,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Data for \"A Wandering Mind is Not Always a Creative Mind: How Thought Dynamics Explain the Relationship between Mind Wandering and Creativity\""},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"de Rooij, Alwin"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Department of Communication and Cognition"},"authorIdentifierScheme":{"typeName":"authorIdentifierScheme","multiple":false,"typeClass":"controlledVocabulary","value":"ORCID"},"authorIdentifier":{"typeName":"authorIdentifier","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"0000-0002-9840-4892"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Atef, Ali"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Department of Communication and Cognition"}},{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Faber, Myrthe"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Department of Communication and Cognition"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactName":{"typeName":"datasetContactName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"de Rooij, Alwin"},"datasetContactAffiliation":{"typeName":"datasetContactAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Department of Communication and Cognition"}},{"datasetContactName":{"typeName":"datasetContactName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Faber, Myrthe"},"datasetContactAffiliation":{"typeName":"datasetContactAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Department of Communication and Cognition"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"The data files for the study \"A Wandering Mind is Not Always a Creative Mind: How Thought Dynamics Explain the Relationship between Mind Wandering and Creativity\". The study encompasses two surveys that aimed to explore how thought context and thought dynamics might influence creativity during idea generation.\n<br><br>\nData for Study 1 contain self-reported thought context, thought dynamics, and creativity. Also, the creative profession (yes/ no) is present in the dataset. Data for Study 2 contain self-reported thought context and thought dynamics, self-reported and expert-rated originality and usefulness. In addition, aggregated data indicating creative and mind-wandering disposition is present in the dataset. All data are (aggregates of) (Likert) scales. The data were collected to explore how thought context and thought dynamics interact to shape creative thinking during idea generation."}}]},{"typeName":"subject","multiple":true,"typeClass":"controlledVocabulary","value":["Social Sciences"]},{"typeName":"keyword","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Humanities"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Creativity"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Free Moving Thoughts"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Mind Wandering"}},{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Spontaneous Thoughts"}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"De Rooij, A., Atef, A., & Faber, M. (2023). A Wandering Mind is Not Always a Creative Mind: How Thought Dynamics Explain the Relationship between Mind Wandering and Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. \n<p>\nPublication status 'In preparation': Journal PsyArxiv Preprints 2023 <a href=\"https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/w45hf\">https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/w45hf</a></p>"}}]},{"typeName":"notesText","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Method: Online surveys using Qualtrics<p>\nUniverse: Purposive sample (study 1), Convenience sample (study 2)</p>\n<p>\nProduction date:<br>\nStudy 1: 28 April 2020 until 31 August 2020<br>\nStudy 2: 25 June 2020 until 31 December 2020"},{"typeName":"producer","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"producerName":{"typeName":"producerName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Tilburg University"}}]},{"typeName":"distributor","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"distributorName":{"typeName":"distributorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"DataverseNL"}}]},{"typeName":"depositor","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"de Rooij, Alwin"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2024-01-25"},{"typeName":"kindOfData","multiple":true,"typeClass":"primitive","value":["Survey data"]},{"typeName":"accessToSources","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Data files <br>\n“data study 1.csv”- A comma-separated file that contains the survey data for study 1. The variable TaskType is categorical (1=”actively pursuing the project”, 2=”working on another work-related problem, project, or idea”, 3=”doing something unrelated to work (e.g., paying a bill)”. ThoughtType is also a categorical variable (1=”I was absorbed in the general idea or problem”, 2=”I was thinking about something unrelated to the general idea or problem”. Other variables are 5-point Likert scales. Note that demographics (age, gender) were removed to protect the participants' privacy. \n<p>\n“data study 2.csv”- A comma-separated file that contains the survey data for study 2. The response variables are ratings done on 5-point Likert scales. Demographics (age, gender) and reported ideas were also removed to protect the participants' privacy.</p>\n\nStructure data package<br>\n“dataset study 1.csv” contains the survey data collected for study 1, whereas “dataset study 2.csv” contains the survey data collected for study 1. The datasets are not linked and analyzed separately. See the published papers for details on the analyses."}]},"dansDataVaultMetadata":{"displayName":"Data Vault Metadata","name":"dansDataVaultMetadata","fields":[{"typeName":"dansDataversePid","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"doi:10.34894/K8TQ2Q"},{"typeName":"dansDataversePidVersion","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1.0"},{"typeName":"dansBagId","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"urn:uuid:e2a0e137-355a-4fd1-87e0-90b9efec139c"},{"typeName":"dansNbn","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-34f282f1-5a2e-459e-80f3-610e5fe2d166"}]}},"files":[{"label":"Data report.pdf","restricted":false,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":25874,"dataFile":{"id":401970,"persistentId":"","filename":"Data report.pdf","contentType":"application/pdf","friendlyType":"Adobe PDF","filesize":100695,"storageIdentifier":"surf://store:18d578d794a-9d92fb38fa8b","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"01a9a8f840e50712ed5b9b105910388ee4b3e86b"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationDate":"2024-02-13","lastUpdateTime":"2024-02-13T14:10:55Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"A comma-separated file that contains the survey data for study 1. The variable TaskType is categorical (1=”actively pursuing the project”, 2=”working on another work-related problem, project, or idea”, 3=”doing something unrelated to work (e.g., paying a bill)”. ThoughtType is also a categorical variable (1=”I was absorbed in the general idea or problem”, 2=”I was thinking about something unrelated to the general idea or problem”. Other variables are 5-point Likert scales. Note that demographics (age, gender) were removed to protect the participants' privacy. ","label":"data study 1.csv","restricted":false,"version":2,"datasetVersionId":25874,"dataFile":{"id":400545,"persistentId":"","filename":"data study 1.csv","contentType":"text/csv","friendlyType":"Comma Separated Values","filesize":2072,"description":"A comma-separated file that contains the survey data for study 1. The variable TaskType is categorical (1=”actively pursuing the project”, 2=”working on another work-related problem, project, or idea”, 3=”doing something unrelated to work (e.g., paying a bill)”. ThoughtType is also a categorical variable (1=”I was absorbed in the general idea or problem”, 2=”I was thinking about something unrelated to the general idea or problem”. Other variables are 5-point Likert scales. Note that demographics (age, gender) were removed to protect the participants' privacy. ","storageIdentifier":"surf://store:18d3fcc2b2d-38395b95a90a","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"953b7913e352f2c012c326ea4efc707a3a10388a"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationDate":"2024-02-13","lastUpdateTime":"2024-02-13T14:10:55Z","fileAccessRequest":false}},{"description":"A comma-separated file that contains the survey data for study 2. The response variables are ratings done on 5-point Likert scales. Demographics (age, gender) and reported ideas were removed to protect the participants' privacy.","label":"data study 2.csv","restricted":false,"version":2,"datasetVersionId":25874,"dataFile":{"id":400544,"persistentId":"","filename":"data study 2.csv","contentType":"text/csv","friendlyType":"Comma Separated Values","filesize":37561,"description":"A comma-separated file that contains the survey data for study 2. The response variables are ratings done on 5-point Likert scales. Demographics (age, gender) and reported ideas were removed to protect the participants' privacy.","storageIdentifier":"surf://store:18d3fcc2be5-5aa4627ec8f6","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"2bb2190cfccaf64f672831b794ab548d068ac545"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationDate":"2024-02-13","lastUpdateTime":"2024-02-13T14:10:55Z","fileAccessRequest":false}}]}}}