{"status":"OK","data":{"id":555314,"identifier":"BNHOAT","persistentUrl":"https://doi.org/10.34894/BNHOAT","protocol":"doi","authority":"10.34894","separator":"/","publisher":"DataverseNL","publicationDate":"2025-10-23","storageIdentifier":"surf://10.34894/BNHOAT","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":10000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":9999,"datasetType":"dataset","locks":[],"latestVersion":{"id":31821,"datasetId":555314,"datasetPersistentId":"doi:10.34894/BNHOAT","datasetType":"dataset","storageIdentifier":"surf://10.34894/BNHOAT","versionNumber":1,"internalVersionNumber":15,"versionMinorNumber":0,"versionState":"RELEASED","latestVersionPublishingState":"RELEASED","deaccessionLink":"","lastUpdateTime":"2025-10-23T17:06:28Z","releaseTime":"2025-10-23T17:06:28Z","createTime":"2025-10-23T12:44:43Z","publicationDate":"2025-10-23","citationDate":"2025-10-23","effectiveDatasetFileCountLimit":10000,"datasetFileUploadsAvailable":9999,"license":{"name":"CC0-1.0","uri":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0","iconUri":"https://licensebuttons.net/p/zero/1.0/88x31.png","rightsIdentifier":"CC0-1.0","rightsIdentifierScheme":"SPDX","schemeUri":"https://spdx.org/licenses/","languageCode":"en"},"fileAccessRequest":true,"metadataBlocks":{"citation":{"displayName":"Citation Metadata","name":"citation","fields":[{"typeName":"title","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Study 1: Evolving Perceived Value of Feedback: Impact on Medical Communication during Simulated Patient Consultations"},{"typeName":"subtitle","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Hao Yu - PhD Projectdata for study 1"},{"typeName":"author","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"authorName":{"typeName":"authorName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Hao Yu"},"authorAffiliation":{"typeName":"authorAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"maastrichtuniversity.nl"}}]},{"typeName":"datasetContact","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"datasetContactName":{"typeName":"datasetContactName","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Shedata"},"datasetContactAffiliation":{"typeName":"datasetContactAffiliation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"maastrichtuniversity.nl"}}]},{"typeName":"dsDescription","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"dsDescriptionValue":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"<B>Summary of the Study</B><BR><BR>\nThis study explored how first-year international medical students’ perceptions of different feedback sources changed over the course of <B>four simulated patient consultations (SPCs)</B> during a <B>36-week qualitative study</B>. The aim was to understand how the value of feedback evolves as communication skills develop.<BR>\n•\t<B>Design:</B> Qualitative longitudinal design.<BR>\n•\t<B>Participants</B>: 10 international first-year medical students (1 male, 9 female; mean age 21).<BR>\n•\t<B>Procedure:</B><BR>\no\tStudents completed four SPCs (each followed by feedback and a tutorial discussion).<BR>\no\tData collected via:<BR>\n\t<I>Closed questions</I> on ranking feedback sources (student buddies, simulated patients, video annotations, tutorial discussions).<BR>\n\t<I>Observation notes</I> from SPCs and tutorials.<BR>\n\t<I>Semi-structured interviews</I> (documenting emotions, reactions, and reflections).<BR>\no\tData analysis: Inductive thematic analysis following Braun & Clarke, triangulated with observation notes.<BR>\n<B>Key Findings:</B><BR>\n1.\t<B>Ranking of feedback sources over four SPCs:</B><BR>\no\tSPC1: Simulated patient feedback ranked highest.<BR>\no\tSPC2: Student-buddy feedback most valued.<BR>\no\tSPC3: Student-buddy feedback still top, but tutorial discussions gained importance.<BR>\no\tSPC4: Tutorial discussions became the most trusted source of feedback.<BR>\n2.\t<B>Four explanatory themes for evolving feedback preferences:</B><BR>\no\t<I>Struggling with stress</I>– Early SPCs were stressful; peer feedback helped with coping strategies.<BR>\no\t<I>Adapting to the challenge</I> – With experience, students shifted from patient-centered feedback to peer and tutorial insights.<BR>\no\t<I>Enhancing learning efficiency</I> – Tutorial discussions reduced extraneous cognitive load by clarifying procedures and prioritizing focus.<BR>\no\t<I>Listening to the full story</I> – Over time, students emphasized empathy, authenticity, and hearing the patient’s narrative.<BR>\n3.\t<B>Discussion & Implications:</B><BR>\no\tEarly reliance on simulated patient feedback reflects novice learners’ need for clear, immediate, patient-centered advice.<BR>\no\tGrowth in valuing peer and tutorial feedback reflects <B>maturation, collaboration, and reflective practice</B>.<BR>\no\tHighlights the need for <B>adaptive feedback mechanisms</B> tailored to students’ developmental stage in communication skills learning.<BR><BR>"},"dsDescriptionDate":{"typeName":"dsDescriptionDate","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2025-10-23"}}]},{"typeName":"subject","multiple":true,"typeClass":"controlledVocabulary","value":["Social Sciences"]},{"typeName":"keyword","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"keywordValue":{"typeName":"keywordValue","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Medical communication; Feedback evolution; Simulated patient consultation (SPC); Peer feedback; Tutorial discussions; Cognitive load; Stress adaptation; Feedback literacy"}}]},{"typeName":"publication","multiple":true,"typeClass":"compound","value":[{"publicationCitation":{"typeName":"publicationCitation","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Yu, H., Xu, T., Köhler, S. E., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Asoodar, M. (under revision). Evolving Perceived Value of Feedback: Impact on Medical Communication during Simulated Patient Consultations. Manuscript under review."}}]},{"typeName":"depositor","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"Shedata"},{"typeName":"dateOfDeposit","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"2025-10-23"}]},"dansDataVaultMetadata":{"displayName":"Data Vault Metadata","name":"dansDataVaultMetadata","fields":[{"typeName":"dansDataversePid","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"doi:10.34894/BNHOAT"},{"typeName":"dansDataversePidVersion","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"1.0"},{"typeName":"dansBagId","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"urn:uuid:550a3825-0686-4bfd-9b7f-a9d570a0f680"},{"typeName":"dansNbn","multiple":false,"typeClass":"primitive","value":"urn:nbn:nl:ui:13-a759e33c-687a-47be-a926-47887dccdcd9"}]}},"files":[{"label":"s1 evloving feedback.atlproj23","restricted":true,"version":1,"datasetVersionId":31821,"dataFile":{"id":555315,"persistentId":"","filename":"s1 evloving feedback.atlproj23","contentType":"application/octet-stream","friendlyType":"Unknown","filesize":564810,"storageIdentifier":"surf://store:19a11114bbb-8257df060438","rootDataFileId":-1,"checksum":{"type":"SHA-1","value":"da5b12adf793cf67d9348b893dbdaf8499a2fb43"},"tabularData":false,"creationDate":"2025-10-23","publicationDate":"2025-10-23","lastUpdateTime":"2025-10-23T17:06:28Z","fileAccessRequest":true}}]}}}